Mr.
Britling, the title character of H.G. Wells’ 1916 novel Mr. Britling Sees it Through, is haunted by the reality of the
First World War, a conflict that had been years in the making but which, with
his optimistic and compassionate sensibilities, he had always publicly and privately
denied as a genuine possibility. The arrival of war in Europe turns Mr.
Britling’s intellectual and emotional reality upside down as he is forced to
face the possibility that people are simply not as good as he believed, and
that perhaps the race to which he belongs is not as mature as he gave them
credit for. Though Mr. Britling is in his fifties, Wells’ novel is a coming of
age story, an unexpected bildungsroman
of a middle-aged man who has been living in the pleasant and quite bubble of
Matching’s Easy, a sleepy English village in Essex county.
For
those of us born in the last years of the so-called baby boom, it is easy to
empathize with Mr. Britling, for lots of reasons. In the wake of the War in
Vietnam there was fostered a significant mistrust of the military adventurism
of Western States. This mistrust gave rise to the era of largely covert
militarism in the late 1970s and 1980s. Our rather childish faith that the
public wouldn’t again be so easily fooled into supporting economically motivated
wars, was quickly dashed in the early 1990s when we watched the first George
Bush commit the West to a war for oil. In an ironic homage to George Orwell, the
first Gulf War ushered us into an what seems to be an era of permanent war and
the protests against Vietnam are little more than a distant memory of
generation now over-leveraged and looking for a comfortable retirement in age
when economic security is a thing of the past. Worse than this, the global insecurity
which Thatcher and Reagan, the Bushes and the Clintons gave birth is now having
the knock-on effect of reigniting the xenophobia and fascism of the 1930s, only
this time it comes with the added complication of climate change, global food and
water crises, and potential nuclear conflagration. As the late Kurt Vonnegut
would have said, so it goes.
Karl
Marx told us that History repeats itself, first as tragedy then as farce. If
so, we are well into an era of farce, but one that promises everywhere to end
in tragedy. But the unfulfilled promise that the anti-war movement of the
Vietnam era left us, is more than an era of permanent war and shock capitalism,
it is also an renewed ideology of “know-nothingism,” that strange pride that
people take in their own ignorance and willfully offensive opinions and
beliefs. And this know-nothingism is gaining speed and popularity against a
monumental digital transformation of culture, a cultural transformation that
can surely only be compared in significance to that brought about by the
printing press.
Our
“Mr. Britling” moment is partly the realization that the progress of the human
sensibilities is nowhere near what we had hoped and that if you give people a
uniform, a rifle, and a marching band they will willingly follow you anywhere, blithely
beating the drums of war. But this is our individualized “Mr. Britling” moment.
At a wider, cultural level, we are witnessing a bildungsroman in reverse; a huge faction of our race that, though we tried to drag them forward into an
enlightened future, is happily reverting back to quagmire of blissful
ignorance, racism, xenophobia, and the active peddling of hate. Unfortunately,
the wilful rejection of rational discourse and the adoption of childish, hate-filled,
squealing (so well illustrated by political figures like Donald Trump), is
happening against the backdrop of a digital transformation of culture that
seems to be, counter-intuitive as it sounds, chipping away at literacy skills
and undermining the kind of intellectual expansion that we once took for
granted in the golden age of reading, when people sat down for long stretches
not only to absorb the imaginative power of novels but read long, syntactically
complex journalism and nonfiction, rather than simply clicking on a link,
looking at a headline and then blathering some uniformed opinion in the
comments section. What would Mr. Britling, a thoughtful essayist and cultural
commentator, make of a generation that has an infinite amount of information at
its fingertips but watches cat videos instead and happily, even proudly, follows
leaders who make ignorance and hate-mongering their modus operandi?
4 comments:
On the eve of World War I, Kirby, the conventional wisdom was that the world's peoples were entering a great age of progress. How wrong that prediction was.
It is a sad reality, Kirby, that the efforts of those who have advocated and taught critical thinking seem to have amounted to very little. The embrace of willful ignorance and decline of rational discourse you describe cannot help but leave one feeling very pessimistic about our future prospects.
Society's are really big on all those "red herring" issues: drug and alcohol addiction; sexual harassment; gay and transgender issues; gun control; terrorism threats; racial division ...and so forth ...when the real issues are the lack of a decent quality-of-life, our deepest spiritual and emotional needs being ignored and neglected, lack of self-respect and moral integrity, the decimation of the "trust factor", the decimation of our freedom-of-choices, the erosion of freedom of speech and self-expression, shameless social rank fascism.
Those are the things that ultimately culminate in the crisis we're witnessing everywhere: the terrorism, the racial strife, the police scandals, the "snake oil" style of politics and advertising, the celebrity worship, and most all other discordant elements pervading the modern-day world.
Correction:
That should be "Societies are big on..."
My apologies.
Post a Comment